Re: FLDS kids



On May 31, 11:55 am, "Connie" <tucson.con...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Sanity" <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:6079d9bc-993e-4d5d-b5d4-4ff91c449972@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 30, 9:54 pm, "Connie" <tucson.con...@xxxxxxx> wrote:



The children lost this one (relatively small) battle, but it's not over
by a
long shot. The pedophiles will lose this war.
No affidavit of complaint from any witness to any offense...
Guilt by association.  Malicious gossip.  Defamation.  Slander.
Unshakeable blind trust in war and hatred as solutions ...  Connie
needs help.

The following comments, in addition to his comment above, were all posted by
nSanity recently:
"Innocent until proven guilty" is a right not to be
disparaged by gossip or other forms of anonymous slander.

 "You presume
guilt without evedence."

"That is the bottom line here.  To guard against rumor and anonymous
malicious slander is precisely the reason for the requirement of
verified complaints in the first place.  This case pretty much repeats
what happened at the Salem Witch Trials."

Now doesn't he sound/seem oh so righteous. But things (and people) are not
always what they seem.  In truth, he's a self-righteous hypocrite, who picks
up and loses small followings over time.  How do you get to be included in
his inner-circle?  Easy - agree with him.  Always.  As long as you agree
with his convoluted "reasoning", he'll post compliments and speak to you in
a gentle, friendly voice.  Disagree and you'll be a target of his wrath.
(Yawn)

Anyway, he and his followers do not practice what they preach.  They
consistently pointed to a "known hoaxter" as the person making the original
call to TX authorities.  They even went so far as to post a link to a large
photo of a woman's face when asked for proof (for the 5th time).  When one
reads the text around the large photo, one learns there is absolutely no
evidence that she did this.  She was arrested in April for a false report
made in February (NO TRIAL, NO CONVICTION), so she was identified as "a
person of interest" around the TX call.  Again, no arrest, no proof,
nothing!  nSanity and his current gang (current only 'til they cross him,
poor saps) are all about unwarranted accusations, slander, guilt by
association, malicious gossip, defamation.

nSanity will also say (just last week in fact) that he'll just "agree to
disagree" with me, which would be fine.  But it's just another lie.
Everything I post has an nSanity comment following it, where he just rips me
with all those crazy baseless accusations.  I work for a living, so don't
have the time (nor the inclination) to respond to them all.  Besides, he has
a sick need for the last word on everything, and more time on his hands than
most people.  He needs to know that I'm happily married and that he should
quit stalking me.

...

 I don't understand his obsession with following me
constantly on here.  I'm fine with never agreeing with him, nor he with me.
"Agreeing to disagree" - I like it!  I agree with it!  The guy's (or gal,
whatever) a total loser and really looks like fool stalking someone he never
agrees with, only to hurl insults, slander, gossip, etc. etc.  What a
hypocrite!

People who hate ethnic groups, in this cast the FLDS, in other cases
Jews etc., are "bigots." Okay, Warren Jeffs did evil, but why assign
guilt to people who once associated with him? Connie has claimed no
personal knowledge of wrong doing but has proceeded to damn these
folks based on nothing but suppositions and assumptions. It's a
pretty sure bet Mr. Jeffs isn't receiving conjugal visits from
juvenials...

The latest I hear is the judge that ordered the release of the
children semi-recanted and effectively attached the proviso that the
families which had been admittedly unlawfully torn apart can now only
be reunited if the parents are willing to make themselves de facto
wards of the State of Texas; all in the absense of any verified
complaint ... Bigotry is as bigotry does. This is the police state
running amok.

Sanity
.


Quantcast