Re: FLDS kids

On May 30, 12:17 pm, Buttercup <delno...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 30, 1:10 pm, Old Tom <rascal...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:







I don't think so.  The original warrant was valid.  Is my
understanding at least.

Let's say a the police get a report from a snitch that you're selling
heroin out of an apartment.  They present the info to a judge, get a
legal valid search warrant and go there but find out you never even
lived in that town.  The apartment was rented out to another person
who had a ton of pot in there which they found while searching for
you.  The snitch was conning them and setting the other person up.

Busted.

The warrant was valid, they found no evidence of the original charges
but found evidence of other crimes during the execution of the search
warrant.

At least that's my understanding.

Old Tom

In what you describe, what you are saying is true as long as what they
find is what the warrant was for.  For example, if the warrant is for
drugs and they find your old mother stuffed into a steamer trunk, that
evidence would be inadmissible.  If she had been stuffed with heroin,
they could get you on that.  I even think if the warrant is for
marijuana and they find cocaine, it is still admissible.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Did they have probable cause for the search warrant? - Not did they
have conclusive proof for the search warrant. As long as there is
probable cause and the search warrant is exeuted in good faith ......

Old Tom
.

Quantcast