Re: the race card

On Apr 29, 7:42 pm, miranda <thehowep...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 29, 6:26 pm, hj st <hjayst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Apr 29, 6:07 pm, miranda <thehowep...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'll go here once: When dithering between Hillary and Obama, an
ordinarily subconscious idea has shown itself in pure daylight:
between the two I think obama should win the presidency because I
think the black male ego has been so lacerated and beaten and locked
down and chained and verbally abused and disenfranchised and
humiliated and exploited and robbed and scapegoated and denied by his
wife and children through welfare laws and the war on drugs, that
though Hillary can take allegorical title also to her gender's
sufference similarly along these sorts of lines, still I think a more
perfect, quick and happy healing is available by electing obama. For
one thing, the afflictions listed above cross economic lines more
readily, hurting men of all levels. By contrast, I feel little
kindred with H once past anatomy and physiology and the homogenous
presure of male chauvenism and mysogeny. <R>

huh? "the black male ego"? for president? we're actually voting a
*person* into office, not their image. the ballot doesn't say, [ ]
black , [ ] woman, [ ] white guy.

i personally wouldn't vote for him because he's too young for me, to
me, race isn't the issue, it's age/experience.

peace,
quiet,..

well that's real proper and all but what makes you think you can
quantify experience? Age doesn't address much. And you can't know to
what is being attended by a person who is perportedly in scenes
ostensively of experience generating opulence. People at weddings
aren't instructed in marriage nor can they report what the bride's
gown looked like or the color of the tuxes. And those are the young!
Then when you turn to the elders, 45 and above, well they napped at
some point. Which point. Points. One nap? hmmm.

And, so, Bush was experienced. I don't want to do w again or any of
it but do want to show how obsolete I find experience.

For all we really know, Hillary was paying attention to shoes in all
those governmental scenes. And obama, too. Might have a shoe fetish
which has crowded out other things he might have been learning. I'm
being gopsmack silly, but the
experience thing is just so abstact, opaque, flimsy and shakey.

What I'm saying is, looks like the choice is H or Obama for
president.

I've been astonished at the beautiful handsome interesting black faces
that have come to populate my tv screen since rocket obama took off
and this is wonderful. It moves me.

And I really don't care for hillary. she's a man like maggie
thatcher. I find women suspect who've taken to immitating men as the
vehicle for their feminism.
Not only that but I never thought monica was any reason for divorce,
but ratifying the welfare reform bill was grounds. (And I didn't vote
for bill clinton the second time either for just that reason. I wrote
in Whoopi Goldberg.)

Why shouldn't we as americans also make happy our black brothers by
our vote come november? You are terribly naive if you think there is
no strong thread of this already in the primaries themselves. People
have voted for him to assuage their own guilt over racial matters.
There's nothing in the constitution that prevents that. Freud and Jung
have come and gone and the constitution abides.

Miranda for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You "rock", sister.
.

Quantcast