How come why for is it?
- From: Sanity <sanity-clause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:11:42 -0800 (PST)
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=4322233&page=1
The Gummint is all hot to show the whole world how powerful it is with
videos, but the surveillance tapes of the Pentagon on 9-11-2001 are
still off limits...... Why should those tapes be unavailable? What
could possibly be on those tapes that the prescriptively sovereign
public shouldn't see? This gaping hole in the Gummint's official
version of what happened on 9-11 is unconscionable, IMHO. The public
has as much "right to know" what is on those tapes as it had to know
what was in the Pentagon Papers leaked to the Washington Post by
Daniel Ellsberg. {The Washington Post skated Scott-free for its role
in publishing the Top Secret Pentagon Papers because the Supreme Court
ruled "the public had a right to know" but Ellsberg went to prison for
his role in informing the public of that which they "had a right to
know."}
Conclusion: The US Gummint is not being honest about what happened on
9-11.
Accountability is the sole measure of credibility.
Peace, Sanity Clause RE
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How come why for is it?
- From: WatchCity
- Re: How come why for is it?
- Prev by Date: Re: Forest camper charged with blocking deputy's vehicle
- Next by Date: Suspected "eco-terrorist" on trial
- Previous by thread: Re: Forest camper charged with blocking deputy's vehicle
- Next by thread: Re: How come why for is it?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|