Re: No, Chuck, please don't do that

On Feb 11, 1:07 am, whistler <whistler...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 10, 11:51 pm, Chuck <livingli...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Feb 10, 7:18 pm, hj st <hjayst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
fast take on big talk (Post of Dec 27, 2007)

Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:18:53 -0600
From: "scottie a." <s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fast take on big talk
To: a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

................snip
     When Rey made his offer, I piped in fast:
them to act on behalf of the 'Family', which only
serves to officialize 'Rainbow Process' from the
outset.

it's discretionary:  Rights are not that way...
this doesn't fix the problem.
.........snip

Descriptive conceptions can be helpful,  as is  "scottie a." 's
descriptive conception of how, why, and wherefore on councilairity and
consensesness

Rainbow Pfamilie of Lifting Lite

or

rAiNbOw family of man Living lightly on Mother Earth (Gaia)

/

The distinction is the ex-officio permission / authorization /
accomidation is granted de facto to the 'group' that gathers, so if
you are with (as in the general vicinity) you are "one of those" and
guilty by proximity. Yeah, it's a fraud, but if you protest you'll be
told "ignorance of the law is no excuse" and if you claim a different
name for your group the Gummint'll just tack on another bugus charge
you'll have to fight. All because High Holy Idiots think they can
barter Liberty for safety and don't care about involving others in
their doom.

No one in history has ever gotten the safety they surrendered their
Liberty for.

Peace, Sanity
.