Re: Point of Information
- From: Sanity <sanity-clause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:30:06 -0800
On Nov 14, 1:05 pm, woodstock <thirdwavevisi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 12:57 pm, whistler <whistler...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 1:43 pm, woodstock <thirdwavevisi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 11:21 am, popeye <watam...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 12:02 pm, Logan <logan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 9:59 am, Sanity <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 9:12 am, Logan <logan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 8:44 am, Karin Zirk <kz...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The last time a permit was signed for the Annual Gathering
of the Tribes, which takes place over the 4th of July, was 2005 in West
Virginia.
No permit was issued by the USFS in Colorado in 2006
or in Arkansas 2007.
Karin
a permit application was signed for CO. It was rejected by the USFS.
If it was accepted it would have become the permit for CO Your point
of Info is bullshit
MORE OBFUSCATION
a permit was not required for AR.
whats your point
l
ob·fus·Cate
1. to confuse, bewilder, or stupefy.
2. to make obscure or unclear: to obfuscate a problem with extraneous
information.
3. to darken.
What Karin said was true, as far as it went.... I think she's trying
to douse a flame and make Peace. Karin is "not that deep" as she once
told me, but I don't think she's as 'shallow' as your post makes her
out to be either. IOW, I think she means well.
Hey, benefit of the doubt, I think the High Holies meant well when
they tried trading MY rights for security without bothering to ask me
first. It's just that there are some lines one does not cross.......
Peace, Sanity
well
a permit application was signed for CO so I think it is OBFUSCATION
Because the statement was perplessly, unclear
The FS did not accept the signed permit because of environmental
reasons
so is it she does not know how permits work or it's OBFUSCATION
Logan
Logan have ya ever read a special use permit??? I was asked by USFS
one year to sign one. After reading it I then handed it back to the
USFS (at Jackson Hole) an said I was not qualified to sign such a
permit because I do not have the finances to cover the (possible)
costs of such. An further more I am only one person an I can not an
will not speak for the masses. Including many folks that I have never
laid eyes on. I then headed back to Bridger Teaton NF an had a hoot.
Well then why don't you see that Summer Breeze is speaking for
everyone without their permission via this DC meeting? What's the
point? <shrug> -w-
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't see S.B. as giving anything away, especially w/ DonE. over her
shoulder. (and others) I also have little faith in the 'meeting'
having ANY sig. in the larger scheme.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No positive significance for rainbow, but perhaps a wedge for the
oppressors...
-w-- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Give 'em an inch, they think they're a ruler. [pun intended]
Sanity
.
- References:
- Point of Information
- From: Karin Zirk
- Re: Point of Information
- From: logan
- Re: Point of Information
- From: Sanity
- Re: Point of Information
- From: logan
- Re: Point of Information
- From: popeye
- Re: Point of Information
- From: woodstock
- Re: Point of Information
- From: whistler
- Re: Point of Information
- From: woodstock
- Point of Information
- Prev by Date: Re: Point of Information
- Next by Date: Re: Follow up on Cassie's surgery
- Previous by thread: Re: Point of Information
- Next by thread: Re: Point of Information
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|