Re: God and science.
- From: Ayin <-ammitusen-@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:39:45 -0700
On 10 Jul, 12:01, cherish <adamat...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 10, 4:46 pm, cypresscr...@xxxxxxx wrote:
You know, I've read Penrose's _The Emporer's New Mind,_ and I don't
think
there is much nead to draw upon quantum theory to explain
consciousness.
It would simply, classically and formally determine the Law of One.
Taking what science has managed to conjure up till now and what the
Teachings have been saying all along and with the scientists own
language at long last put an end to speculation and declare that there
is Supreme Design and One supreme Creator within all. One Law. One
Truth. God is One.
It would put every single argument - creationist/evolutionist, atheist/
faithist to rest. For all time.
Now, wouldn't that be nice? I think they call that peace on earth.
~0~
The String Theory shows nothing that would indicate the existance of a
supreme being. it's about vibration being the beginning mode of
material existance. you can apply personality to a vibrating string
if you want to but that would simply be human ego projection onto pure
energy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: God and science.
- From: cherish
- Re: God and science.
- References:
- God and science.
- From: zanthius . dxun
- Re: God and science.
- From: Sanity
- Re: God and science.
- From: zanthius . dxun
- Re: God and science.
- From: Sanity
- Re: God and science.
- From: cherish
- Re: God and science.
- From: cypresscrane
- Re: God and science.
- From: cherish
- God and science.
- Prev by Date: Re: God and science.
- Next by Date: Re: God and science.
- Previous by thread: Re: God and science.
- Next by thread: Re: God and science.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|