Re: New OKC Revelations

On May 3, 12:09 pm, woodstock <thirdwavevisi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 3, 6:25 am, michael_this...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:



On May 3, 4:53 am, woodstock <thirdwavevisi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 2, 5:52 pm, michael_this...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I certainly don't automatically doubt the story, seein as how all
evidence points to an inside job concerning 9-11. Some genius in the
gummit has been promoting this kind of tactic to win the hearts and
minds of mostly dumbed down americans for quite a while, and it has
been tried on numerous occassions according to reports. And it has
worked to some extent. Enough to get officials that are part of the
conspiracy to undermine the liberties of the american people. Is there
any sound reason why it's ok that people make deals and comprimises
with the gummint concerning peaceable assemblies for masses of
individuals? -w-

Is there any reason in even asking that question when there will be no
attempt at rational dialog and any answer you don't agree with will
receive responses like,

Of course there are reasons for asking that question Michael. Some
people actually DO wake up.

What exactly are you saying here?

"Of course there are reasons for asking that question Michael. Some
people actually DO wake up."

Who is it that is "sleeping?"

People that believe that it's ok for other people to make deals and
compromises with duh gummint concerning peaceable assemblies
representing the rest of the people.

Are
you saying that you might wake up or are you saying other people might
wake up and agree with you?

I woke up a long time ago. I've seen other's wake up too. It's not
about wether someone agrees with "me".

Is that how you define rational dialog?

<shrug>

The poor little sleeping people might wake up and agree with you?

They might wake up and wake other sleepers up.

Or
is this just another way of you calling people dupes?

Both.

And there you have it. What might begin as a discussion of the permit
will rapidly become a discussion of who's a dupe or who wants to just
party. Quite frankly I think I'm smarter than you, better educated
than you, the breadth and depth of my knowledge exceeds your's, I've
read and studied more extensively than you, I party less than you,
I'm more serious and dedicated to my spiritual path than you are to
your's, but I am no more interested in this kind of high brow ***
waving than I am in bill's low brow *** waving. So don't expect me to
pretend you're interested in a serious or reasoned dialog on this
issue when the height of your "reasoning" consists of calling those
who disagree with you dupes and your best "rational" argument is
telling then to wake up. Do you really not get it? Do you seriously
not understand why people of good sense don't want to discuss this
issue with you or your allies?



My main point is
that I don't anymore believe there is a possibility of rational dialog
on this issue. I have never seen it. I don't believe you or your
allies on this issue sincerely want it.

.

Loading