Re: Lovin' you, brother

On Mar 4, 3:46 pm, "Sanity" <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:59 pm, "hj st" <hjayst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 3, 6:54 pm, "Sanity" <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 3, 7:00 pm, "hj st" <hjayst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

ok, so why not take all this permit angst to the foisters rather than
the foistees?

I am doing my best to do just that right here.

i meant the U.S. government and it related agencies.

The U.S. Government is one great big good-ol'-boy-club oligarchy that
bears no resemblance to its constitution, not a source of remedies.
Wade in and dance the bureaurocratic shuffle yourself if you don't
believe me. I danced for years and did time for my trouble, so no
thanks.



try and fail,.. quit! spirit knows when to give up the ghost, eh?


as for what you are doing here, imo, agenda agenda agenda.

Trying to wake people up is a risky hobby, but has its moments.
"agenda agenda agenda" doesn't voice anything or action to discuss.
Tell ya what hj, since you won't say 'yes or no' as to whether or not
Garrick Beck is your spokesman in answer to my honest question, I'm
going to just click past you for a while. It is obvious to me your
"agenda" doesn't include two-way comm-uni-cation. Ploink.

Sanity RE

sorry man, you never asked me a "yes or no" 'honest' question about
some dude. please, try to keep up.

why'd you even show up at the first gathering you ever went to? why
did you keep going after that? (as it's clear what/who caused you to
cease gathering.)

as for my agenda here,.. entertainment.


peace,
quiet,..


.