Re: This was new to me... You?
- From: "Sanity" <sanity-clause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:25:29 -0700
DAN 1 wrote:
From the article: "It is maintained by councils consisting of any"non-member" who wishes to be part of the council." This implies that
said councils have some power to make rules or ordinances or something
that everyone there has to abide by. In fact, gatherings are
maintained by the mores (folk-ways) and nothing more. The jurisdiction
of any clownshow council DIES at the edge of its circle. Gatherings
are not representative republics and councils do not have the proxy of
people just cuz they gathered within a mile or three of eachother.
Representation without election is fraud.
Sanity Clause RE
Sanity RE
The original Wikepedia article stated:
"It is maintained by councils consisting of any
"non-member" who wishes to be part of the council."
This word "non-member". It is strange and alien to me in the context it
is used of a relation to a council. Why do they say "non-member"
instead of "member"? And is this a correct usage within Rainbow Family
terminology?
Respectfully, DAN 1
"Rainbow Family terminology"? Whatsat? I schpriek Angleish.
Dear Dan 1;
You asked me so I'll give you my opinion. When I used to go to rainbow
gatherings the full spectrum of hue-manity was welcomed and danged if
they didn't come. Now that self appointed leaders, spokespersons and
managers have usurped the egalitarian nature of the happenings the term
"non-member" is a dodge to mask a scam, IMHO of course. The people
that thought up the US Gummint also said they represented the interests
of "the People" but instead of 'in council' they acted "In Congress"
years before the US Congress was spozdly created by the US
Constitution. Representation without election is fraud in either case.
It's a word game. Hang out here on AGR long enough and you'll either
get the hang of it or not. %~\
Peace,
Sanity RE
.
- References:
- This was new to me... You?
- From: Chuck
- Re: This was new to me... You?
- From: Sanity
- Re: This was new to me... You?
- From: DAN 1
- This was new to me... You?
- Prev by Date: Re: This was new to me... You?
- Next by Date: Re: This was new to me... You?
- Previous by thread: Re: This was new to me... You?
- Next by thread: Re: This was new to me... You?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
