Re: Going offline to set up studio in Bus

So this is what I got done so far with video stuff- this is unedited
but I'm now editing the same video but I think you'll like this anyway:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4221766619246442794&hl=en
-w-

ms quark cable wrote:
yeah! that microphone thing is a tough one... ha ha ha. but i'm so
glad you tried this! i tried the magix and just got lost right away.
see, for all of my skills and accomplishments i'm just not very
competant. i notice more and more stars using audacity. it'sjust
pretty nice. and dig, I have a new sound card my son installed and
gave me. and I have a new headset/mic unit that's like buttah. and I
have a whole new sound more full and more beautiful that comes out of
my refurbished mouth but for some reason my singing playing and
recording have trailed off after fevered production daily hell or high
water for like five years. I just looked up one day last month and
looked around and said, whoa! where'd that go. but I'm going to take a
nap here and when I arise I'm gonna do a new song and put it on
soundclick for agr specially. night night. <R>
woodstock wrote:
woodstock wrote:
ms quark cable wrote:
woodstock, please, indulge me. google audacity. download that and try
it. just a song's worth. <R>

ok, I downloaded it- tried to record- but to no avail, but with a mic.
I'll see if there is anything I can adjust and so on. I like the idea
that it's open source though. -w-

doh! I didn't have the mic plugged in! lol! It works fine- very easy to
use! I still have lots of steps to do before I bring the keys in here.
What I'll eventually do is record on the 3 recording programs and
compare them for quality. Still, that magix software also lets me use
video and flash elements where voyetra and audacity doesn't. But if
either audacity or voyetra makes better quality sound tracks, I can
always import them into the magix medium- we'll see. Thanks for that
good link! -w-






woodstock wrote:
ms quark cable wrote:
you go, hippie. and, also, you'll be delighted that i'm envious. <R>

I've added the Delta 66 sound card and breakout box, and got the
speakers going- but having problems using certain programs such as the
windows live messenger- My pewter sounds come through but when I go to
make a computer call the speakers volume slider goes all the way off
and the mic is weak- so needing to play around with adjustments. I'm
thinking that adding the mixer might help, so that's what I'm playing
with today. -w-


woodstock wrote:
Hopefully my router's signal will reach good enough to my wireless card
on my pewter. May have to look into some kinda booster. I have an a/c
hooked up in there now and it's cool enough for the equipment. Here's a
list of equipment I'll be useing:

A Delta 66 pro from M-Audio (formerly MidiMan) sound card- useing my
old Breakout box from the Delta 44 which was the Dman 2044 (not
compatible with Win XP) which has 4 in's/4 out's and the card has 2
S/PDIF rca jacks as well- supposedly that makes it 6IN/6OUT - we'll
see.

Next I have a 10 channel mixer from Midiman called a MultiMixer 10
(duh) Will prolly need some line adapters since this mixer will be
between the keyboards and/or other inputs like mics and/or guitars etc.
and the Delta 66 sound card.

My pewter has a 2.6 Ghz processor, 200 gig hard drive, and currently 1
GB PC 2700 ram which I plan on upgrading to at least 2 GB's of ram. A
DVD burner too.

Software I will use is Magix music maker 2005 deluxe. This can be used
to mix audio, video, and flash elements into one editable production. I
also have the old Voyetra orchestrator which is audio only, but is
still usefull.

All of this stuff comes out of 4 small amplifiers instead of desktop
speakers.

All of my keyboards are Kurzweil. My K1000 and K1000 special edition
have problems, but can be used via MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital
Interface) each with 76 weighted keys like a real piano (the weighted
keys, not the number of keys) . One of them I can use the keys, and the
other I can use the internal programs. I also have the K2000 VP which
is more advanced internally, but has only 61 keys that are not
weighted, but touch sensitive (referred to as a potentiometer in geek
speak) If I were ALOT more financially enabled, I would have the
original Kurzweil K250 with 88 keys- live onboard sampling is one of
the advanced features over the less expensive boards I have. That one
was 15 grand a decade ago. I'd also have some MOOG equipment and a
selection of rack mounted synths (the internal parts of the synthesizer
without the keys- controllable through any Midi capable instrument- but
in my case, a keyboard) Anyway, I'm going for it- will take a few
months to master all of this stuff- tons of manual pages to read. Will
post samples of my experiments when it's all hooked up and online. Have
fun! -w-

.

Quantcast