Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- From: "Connie" <tucson.connie@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:38:03 -0700
"jmcgill" <jmcgill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0U7fg.6361$_c1.3506@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thunder wrote:
When I stop and think about it, it's true. If you are
camping with 75 strangers or friends old or new and one more
person shows up then it seems like the FS gets all snarly
and decides the next person is a criminal and if the others
want to allow that person in and you don't have a permit,
the FS forces you to ban the person, or essentially
privatize the event.
Well, that's the letter of the law, of course. But we need to remain
conscious of the fact that we're opposing a "75 person" law in the
interest of a gathering on the order of thirty thousand. They don't
really use the same tactics on gatherings of a hundred disassociated
people, that they use on the stupendously, mind-bendingly large rainbow
gatherings.
30K !?!?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- From: Hawker
- Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- From: ulcerpentacidis
- Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- References:
- Forest Service Forces Private Events
- From: Thunder
- Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- From: jmcgill
- Forest Service Forces Private Events
- Prev by Date: Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- Next by Date: Re: nationals moved to new location
- Previous by thread: Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- Next by thread: Re: Forest Service Forces Private Events
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
