Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: "spiritrising" <spiritrising@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:37:05 GMT
well i never gave you permit or license to gather on my place, but ya still
came, and the cops wern't there. did ya have fun? the whole nation could
have come, and it would have been ok, even some i didn't even know came, so
yep they never got permit or license either. spiritrising
"Sanity RE" <sanity-clause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134051200.143936.228150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> spiritrising wrote:
>> well i just wanted to point out that gatherings are NOT limited to
>> national
>> forest, thats why missouri is working, public land is public land.
>> suprised
>> some haven't thought of blm land to gather, tho in the past small
>> gatherings
>> have happened.
>> alot will say long standing tradition, but it was never a rule at all,
>> political types just want to confront the gov. so it happens that way.
>> very
>> first gathering was on private land, till some wanted to make a point and
>> climb the mount. no reason the national coudn't be held on private land,
>
> Yeah? I'll give you a good reason not to gather on private land, viz.:
> LICENSE! Part of the legal definition of "license" is PERMITion to
> trespass. Can't have a gathering on private land without the
> landlord's permission and that makes him/her responsible for regulation
> of the licensees. Under 'respondeat superior' [let the master answer]
> in conjunction with "zero tolerance" if someone brought some drugs in
> quantity to give away the family farm that had been in the family for
> generations could be auctioned. Insurance costs just in case sombody
> got hurt, ect. ect.... On public land individuals are at Liberty, on
> private land they are there by permission (under license). Do you
> understand "Liberty is not license" yet? I'll keep pluggin' away until
> people get it. :^)
>
> "This land is my land,
> It isn't your land.
> If you don't get off,
> I'll blow your head off!
> I've got a shotgun
> And you don't got one.
> This land was made for only me."
> Ben Stevens, all rights denied in favor of license.
>
>> or
>> some other venue, heck if they were to ask some tribes they may find
>> themselves smack in the middle of a res, without fs on their back.but it
>> jumps back to political mouothing and agendas. spiritrising
>
> Tribal lands aren't public as you well know, but (in theory at least)
> are a separate Nations, until the FBI decides to start shooting in
> which case all them injuns is guilty whether there's any evidence or
> not. Free Peltier!
>
> Bottom line: If you need permission it isn't free and you ain't either.
>
> Sanity Clause RE
>>
>> [chomp]
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: Sanity RE
- Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- References:
- Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: bodhi
- Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: Dia
- Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: spiritrising
- Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: Dia
- Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: spiritrising
- Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- From: Sanity RE
- Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- Prev by Date: Re: Baby Boomers
- Next by Date: Re: Baby Boomers
- Previous by thread: Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- Next by thread: Re: Another's "Joe's Valley" next summer??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading