Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- From: "spiritrising" <spiritrising@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:35:54 GMT
oak ridge has the oldest reactor ever made, it still has one for production
of bobm grade material too. at y-12 thats the plase where it is put together
and fined tuned, i couldn't get into some parts of that place, but i have
seen enough to tell me those in oak ridge sure haqve a dangerous place to
live. you can still see today where the entrance to town is with gaurd gates
and all. alot bought the old houses and redid them inside and out, only
difference in the houses now is the paint and or covering material.
spiritrising
"Shava_X" <voodopeople@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.08.12.08.41.59.644579@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:40:51 +0000, spiritrising wrote:
>
>> "Shava_X" <voodopeople@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2005.08.12.02.30.36.401558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:01:10 +0000, spiritrising wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Shava_X" <voodopeople@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2005.08.11.06.44.57.976952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:49:23 -0700, foote wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> many enviromists
>>>>>> Stewart Brand ...whole eaarth catalogue
>>>>>> jared Diamond ...Collapse book
>>>>>> Patrick Moore ..co founder of GreenPeace
>>>>>> Hough Montefoire... Friends of the earth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are endorsing nuclear energy
>>>>>> to solve global warming
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/08/07/ING95E1VQ71.DTL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.rmi.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.mydr2.com/fav_links.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fffffffffffff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, Nuke plants don't spew out green house gasses ...
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> no but they sure spew out alot of heat, that is bad too i would think,
>>>> then
>>>> the logistics of getting rid of the spent fuel rods, i think all of it
>>>> is
>>>> a
>>>> catch twenty two thing. me on the geodome i putting up will have
>>>> solar,
>>>> and
>>>> wind power, if i had a creek, i would add a generator. as i go along i
>>>> will
>>>> add more to the dome to make it more self sufficient. sure ain't gonna
>>>> hook
>>>> it up to a pole. found a biolet for the bathroom already, made by
>>>> rainbows
>>>> too! networking the different communities is a goal in this area, to
>>>> help
>>>> each other with the differnt things that are made in each community,
>>>> mine
>>>> will be the school, have teachers lined up to teach now.
>>>> spiritrising
>>>
>>>
>>> They don't spew out significantly more heat than any conventional power
>>> plant. And it probably is not a problem, the amount is likely nominal.
>>>
>>> The spent fuel is the problem. As long as it remains contained,
>>> everything is OK. But keeping it contained for the 10 - 100 thousand
>>> years needed before it can be considered safe, that is a challenge...
>>>
>>> Good lick with the Geo-dome.
>>>
>>> One of the arguments for deregulation of the power is grid is that it
>>> would allow people to choose where their electricity comes from.
>>> Supposedly in Texas people can arrange so that at some of their
>>> electricity comes from wind or solar sources ...
>>>
>> thanks, i worked at y-12 in oakridge for a little while, the plant they
>> have
>> their was producing more pollution than the gas fired plant not too far
>> away, they had to spen millions to stop material from entering the
>> atmosphere. but that is changed now, before they didn't have the duel
>> system
>> for cooling, now they do. spiritrising
>>
>
>
> Oakridge has some of the older reactors doesn't it? The older ones had
> real problems not being clean. Newer facilities are a lot better, though
> they may still have room for improvement...
>
>
>
.
- References:
- Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- From: foote
- Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- From: Shava_X
- Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- From: spiritrising
- Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- From: Shava_X
- Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- From: spiritrising
- Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- From: Shava_X
- Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- Next by Date: Re: statement of support to Cindy Sheehan
- Previous by thread: Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- Next by thread: Re: Nuclear energy can't solve global warming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|