Re: Another Permit rant: was/Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: "spiritrising" <spiritirising@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:31:52 GMT
i received that letter! and with thier hope of future cooperations between
all parties. see some know how to work with gov.(the ones without the guns)
they love the forests too. if you don't like it tough, no group was spoke
of, as there was no such thing, i spoke in a singular division. if ya wanna
make more of it be my guest, won't change anything. spiritrising
"Sanity Clause" <Sanity-Clause@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pKnFe.488495$cg1.305518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Lookingheart wrote:
>
>> I would say that you picked out the harshest folks diatribing here and
>> skipped right past the rightous folks like, Ray, Sanity, Inea,
>> ect......
>>
>> Honestly, I think some of the folks posting here actually believe I
>> know some of them other monuka's posting here - Regardless, I love my
>> tribe and we have some solid caring folks who know how to have a good
>> time. Rainbow USE to be about living your heartsong and working towards
>> community and peace. That all went out the door when the guru's started
>> sign permits, allowing violence into the gatherings and folks like
>> bohdi, ohlooney, stubbs and other hate mongers started calling it their
>> home and trying to dictate to others how it was going to be.
>>
>> A newbie might ask "Where's the love?" Would you be able to point it
>> out? You might ask yourself, "What is Rainbow doing that is so
>> positive?" Not what it has done in the past but lately.
>>
>> Where's the positive growth?
>>
>
> For starts, thanks for the complement above. :^) I've filtered off the
> gurus and hate mongers and am trying to work instead of wasting my time
> preaching the reasonable to them what come here to argue only. %~\
>
> Just a thought on the peaceable assembly near Ava: Someone said there was
> a letter written by the State foresters thanking folks for cleaning up the
> camp grounds, and I wondered who it was addressed to, that is, was
> competent to receive it for the group? "competent to receive it for the
> group" is a snag and a trap IMHO. The Gummint flatters an ego and says
> nice things and the ego says "Your welcome." politely, not even realizing
> he/she was speaking in the capacity of representing a group...
>
> Who got the letter? Ever been damned with feigned praise? CAVEAT! If
> it's a group it ain't public! If it ain't public it comes under
> administrative law, not constitutional law. "Divide and conquer." is the
> old Roman battle tactic.....
>
> Who got the letter?
>
> "The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance." - Ben Franklin
>
> "I am a citizen of the world." - Thomas Paine a.k.a Common Sense
>
> Sanity Clause RE
.
- References:
- Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Anon Amiss
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Connie
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Tha Billdozer
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: spiritrising
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: bodhi
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Lookingheart
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Dia
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Dia
- Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Lookingheart
- Another Permit rant: was/Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- From: Sanity Clause
- Looking Heart's Rant
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- Next by Date: Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- Previous by thread: Another Permit rant: was/Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- Next by thread: Re: Looking Heart's Rant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading