Re: Blizzard F***ed Up Big with 2.2.0

xera wrote:

"RogerM" <roger.mckay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46FA82ED.E5F2BDF0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ScratchMonkey wrote:

Rather Play Pinball <123@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:Y2eKi.420$sw6.252
@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com:

You suck Blizzard. Get some real programmers.

You must be new here. This happens with every patch. A check of the
archives at Google Groups would show that.


Your point here is invisible.

Did you play on the PTR? If not, you have no place to complain. The only
way they can test their code is with real players on the PTR, and if
people
don't go shake out the bugs there, then they're left in the code for the
non-testers to find.

Umm, did the voice comm work on the PTR?


Yep. It did.

Then where is it?

--

Best Online comic: http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0001.html
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Blizzard F***ed Up Big with 2.2.0
    ... This happens with every patch. ... archives at Google Groups would show that. ... did the voice comm work on the PTR? ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Blizzard F***ed Up Big with 2.2.0
    ... This happens with every patch. ... archives at Google Groups would show that. ... did the voice comm work on the PTR? ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Blizzard F***ed Up Big with 2.2.0
    ... archives at Google Groups would show that. ... Did you play on the PTR? ... "testing" so much as creating a level 70 raid geared character so they ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Blizzard F***ed Up Big with 2.2.0
    ... archives at Google Groups would show that. ... Did you play on the PTR? ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Patch notes 2.3.0
    ... Wowinsider.com has a "change-log" posted today of the differences between ... Now that you've gotten a bit of a chance to look at the live patch notes ... PTR build. ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
Loading