Re: Do Curse of Elements and Curse of Shadows stack?

"Devast8or" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hi all,

if 2 warlocks both cast curse of shadows (or elements) on the same target,
will they stack?

It can't be done. The only curse that can be put multiple times on the same
target is curse of doom.

And would there be any point in doing so (someone here said you can no
longer make the mobs have megative resistance with these curses, do bosses
have enough resistances that two of the same curse would be any use)?

it's true that resistance can no longer be MADE negative - it zeroes out
and then you just get the 10% damage increase (nothing to sneeze at). I'm
not sure what happens if the resistance is already negative, but I think it
gets even more negative - during a brief burst of shadow sensitivity on the
mobs leading to firemaw (we only got him to 45%, disappointing but not
terrible for a first attempt), we were pulling whimper-inducing
shadowbolts. *
--
* PV something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
like corkscrews.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do Curse of Elements and Curse of Shadows stack?
    ... longer make the mobs have megative resistance with these curses, ... I meant if both warlocks cast the same curse. ... Will casting Curse of Shadow first make Curse of Elements easier to ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Questions, questions...
    ... Is multiple resistance to non-damage attacks ... from various dungeons? ... Or will I keep seeing this Nazgul constantly now? ... risk the curse? ...
    (rec.games.roguelike.angband)
  • Re: Darn, about 90% of the named elites in Outlands are non-Fear-able...
    ... What about Curse of Exhaustion? ... CoEx is only usable by affliction specced warlocks. ... Fear on the other hand prevented ... If its resistance, I believe CoS ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Percy
    ... > Doesn't Percy's over-ambitious need to be successful make him an easy ... > target of LV's control--Imperius Curse? ... ron and ginny are never going to be good when ever ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: Performing the Avada Kedavra
    ... There is no contradiction whatsoever between Bellatrix' statement (which apply to /all/ the Unforgivable Curses), Harry's failure to cast the Cruciatus Curse at Bellatrix, and the death of Gibbon accidentally hit by an /Avada Kedavra/ intended for Remus. ... The killing curse is not target-specific in the sense that it can kill only the one target it was /intended/ to kill, but it does require the same level of intention, of /meaning/ it, as the Cruciatus Curse obviously does. ... Harry failed at properly casting the Cruciatus Curse because he is basically unable to enjoy causing pain, and Gibbon died due to an accidental hit, because the blond Death Eater was fully capable of casting the spell at someone else. ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)