Re: addon problems after 1.7 patch




"Trooper" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:MPG.1d935e8175e0832598a033@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ok

So after the patch I'm having a few problems with addons.
Lootlink and book of the dead both throw errors, and one of my map
addons throws an error on return from the map screen.

I've switched them off for the time being and will wait for the new
versions, but it would be nice if each version of a patch didn't rape
all my addons ;)


-- Trooper usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove the obvious)


Too bad Blizzard couldn't just FIX THEIR CRAPPY INTERFACE.
Incorporate all of the most popular add-ons, not just a little here & there. Keep the default interface the same for those that like it simple. Have a interface consol with OPTIONS. Then we wouldn't have to scramble to fix our add-ons with every patch.


I got lucky, I am using some compiled UI called NurfedUI & only see one error message when entering new areas. Nice clean interface without all that extra garbage like pictures of your targets & group members.

Last time we had this type of thread I was told in the end I need to buy Blizzard if I want changes. BullSHIT. The customer's voice has a ton of influence. Bitch at Blizzard if you don't like it. I sure as hell am.

.



Relevant Pages

  • addon problems after 1.7 patch
    ... So after the patch I'm having a few problems with addons. ... Lootlink and book of the dead both throw errors, and one of my map ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Collection vs well defined transfer objects
    ... > object in the Map or two different Integer objects in the Map. ... else beside the interface signature in any case. ... > handler would simple get the result from the Business Object and place ... > are a custom data type or a basic data type, ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Collection vs well defined transfer objects
    ... > I am not advocating that complex data types be split up into basic ... > object in the Map or two different Integer objects in the Map. ... > interface of my class, as the parameter checking has now been pushed ... Transfer Object, adding or removing a parameter from the request will ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: [RFC 0/2] new kfifo API
    ... and I disagree about the locking changes. ... Except for Andi's NMI driver, ... Changing the behaviour of an existing interface without changing ... but the first patch will break something. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: "Program to an interface" - When to break a design pattern
    ... in this case, no, programming to the interface would be the wrong ... remark "I need the map to retain the insertion order." ... insertion order in a Map. ... The return type being a LinkedHashMap, itself, doesn't tell you _anything_ about its iteration order. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)