Re: whaich Hardware to speed up WOW



HI

maxnews01@xxxxxx wrote:
i looked at my Ram while playing WOW it never gets "full" so why should
2Gig rock more then 1gig do?


You know you can turn on more columns in Taskmgr than the standard?
View-> select columns on the processes tab

make sure to choose the following:
image name, username, cpu, cpu time, mem usage, vm size

*vm size* is really important here, because e.g. my firefox shows at the moment that it's using 9536k, but the vm size is 52'844k ....

when it comes to memory usage, it's the sum of both that counts ... and the vm size is actually worse when it comes to performance ... this has always to be loaded from the HD when the game needs it ...

if you look on the perfomance tab, you see the *physical memory*. in a message above you wrote that you have

> physical memory:  1,000,000 kB

did you round this yourselfs? because this is actually a pretty weird ammount, my notebook (1.5g with separate graphics memory) shows 1571760, a desktop machine here (1gig with separate graphics card and memory) shows 1047276 ...

when you look at "system cache", thats an amount which the OS reserves. this is not directly available to WOW ...

> so it's all consistent.  As you can see, WoW and the various
> background processes never exceeded 761 MB in six hours of play, many
> zones and capital cities full of textures, lots of AH activity, etc.
> In other gaming sessions I've never seen the peak exceed 800 MB, so
> these results are typical.

starting wow on the desktop just now:
password screen: 93+89 mb
after login in orgrimar AH (Dun Morogh) with a lvl 38 Shaman, no addons installed, at 15:50 in the afternoon, so theres nobody there: 359+360mb, and the count is rising ... a minute later its already 366+365mb ...


on my desktop at home, I usually have addons installed which use about 40mb more, so i'm already at the 760MB you mention.
I'll have to test this at home after I played some time, but i guess the amount needed will sky rocket in the evening, or when the allies are trying to raid XR ...
I'll try to post some values here



insofar, I am forced to agree with Rene: Buy more RAM, buy a faster Harddisk

Urs

--
mail: urs [dot] steiner [at] switzerland [dot] org
phone: 078 / 790 32 16
	The reason that every major university maintains a department of
	mathematics is that it's cheaper than institutionalizing all those
	people.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: looking for a simple profiling idea
    ... That will let you see which are using the most CPU time. ... for a page of memory to be brought in from virtual memory on disk - it isn't doing anything at all. ... the iostat tool will give you a system-level picture of how much time is being spent waiting for IO. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Is Windows 98 SE More Secure Than OS X?
    ... It's so sad to see people so brainwashed by one company. ... ZERO CPU time and very little memory. ... Is it a waste of power to post on USENET all damn day? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: SMP LAPACK
    ... Shared Memory Parallel Architecture. ... Threads Speedup ... CPU Time in User Mode: ... CPU Time in Kernel Mode: ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)
  • Re: [TOMOYO #12 (2.6.28-rc2-mm1) 05/11] Memory and pathname management functions.
    ... waste of CPU time. ... __alloc_pagesand kmalloczero all the memory too. ... So we recognised our mistakes and when sysfs (otherwise known as procfs ... V2:)) came about we decided that sysfs files should not make the same ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: how to find union of two arrays
    ... I do not notice any such memory leak in XL2003 SP3 with VBA 6.5.1024. ... I have only Task Manager Mem Usage and VM Size statistics to look at. ... The local declaration alone is sufficient to increase ... With #Const globDef set to True, ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.programming)