Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: The alMIGHTY N <natlee75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 17, 12:15 am, JordanLund <lu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 16, 9:06 pm, argento32 <aaronpyn...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why write an article on sales figures on games you haven't played.
I've played both and although both are good. Prototype is not even
close to the game that InFAMOUS is.
Because I find statistics and market share interesting. I know, that's
strange, but there you go.
There's nothing wrong with being interested in the data. The problem
is in the skewed conclusions you more often than not render from that
data.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: ksdj1@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- References:
- Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: Jonah Falcon
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: Nick Soapdish
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: Jonah Falcon
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: Nick Soapdish
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: JordanLund
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: argento32
- Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- From: JordanLund
- Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- Prev by Date: Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- Next by Date: Re: Saints Row 2- after the fact
- Previous by thread: Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- Next by thread: Re: Prototype/inFamous sales numbers (Lund)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|