Re: Hulk is a sequel... to the TV show!

On Jun 15, 10:35 am, "Phil Da Lick!"
<phil_the_l...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yeah well, no matter how good this film is the appearance of the hulk
puts me off it completely. It's just pants. If I want cgi to look
unrealistic i'll watch roger rabbit.

I thought it looked pretty good. There are closeups on Hulks arms and
you can see veins pulsing. There's a calm bit with Betty in a cave
that looks very good.

Does it also suffer from the other latest boner-inducer in holly wood
circles, i.e. camera wobble? That's really beginning to annoy me as
well. It's just distracting.

I only remember one bit of wobble and that's during a fight on a
college campus. A student captures a bit of it on his cell phone.

- Jordan

.