Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- From: mordacpreventor@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:52:05 -0800
On Nov 13, 3:20 pm, Mark Johnson <mark-john...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mordacpreven...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 13, 2:35 pm, Mark Johnson <mark-john...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FlashThreeDee wrote:
Assassin's Creed:Gamespot said the other way around, they said PS3 had better frame rates
IGN and French video game site jeuxvideo.com
the PS3 version seems to be a quite rushed job, and as much as they
managed to optimize the beginning (still has framerate problems), the
last tier of the game is particularly affected (to the point it is
affecting gameplay).
They shouldn't have released this version so early, there is hope it
gets better with updates though for the PS3-only people (but i doubt
they will invest a lot of resources for a console patch)
No they didn't.
They said it had "a slightly more solid frame rate".
Oh and what is a solid frame rate then, if its not better frame rates?-
Solid and better are conceptually different. You may want to equate
the two, but you won't be correct.
.
- References:
- Bliggy where are you? ;)
- From: FlashThreeDee
- Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- From: Mark Johnson
- Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- From: mordacpreventor
- Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- From: Mark Johnson
- Bliggy where are you? ;)
- Prev by Date: Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- Next by Date: Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- Previous by thread: Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- Next by thread: Re: Bliggy where are you? ;)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
