Re: TF2: Turrets are overpowered

On Oct 24, 1:44 am, Tom <jimver...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 24, 3:11 am, slayerma...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:



On Oct 24, 12:02 am, Tom <jimver...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 24, 12:50 am, slayerma...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Oct 23, 7:42 pm, Tom <jimver...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 23, 6:59 pm, slayerma...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Oct 23, 1:40 pm, "Tom" <no...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<slayerma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1193167019.016328.299340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Oct 23, 11:34 am, BaltimoreBri <Baltimore...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

demo from around a corner. I think there's a device that a spy can
plant on them, but I haven't tried that class too much yet.

You're an idiot and I stopped reading here. Complaining that turrets
are overpowered while simultaneously saying you have no idea what a
sapper is or how spies work explains your own grievance. One good spy
can easily take out any number of turrets and the engineers with them.
The game is mostly a balancing act, offense classes beat support
classes, support classes are the key to beat defense classes, and
defense classes are the way to stop offense classes. It's so fucking
simple they even spell it out for you when you choose a class.

It's sad that you can't even answer without attacking someone that was
simply asking for a little help. I guess when you had an issue trying to
figure out a game, etc, you were also an idiot for not figuring it out,
right?

Oh, my bad, I forgot to answer your question and then personally
attack you because I don't like you.

Yes, the next time I play a game for 15 minutes, then come here and
complain about a 'flaw' in the game because I am obviously terrible at
the game and only tried half the classes, you have MY PERMISSION to
call me an idiot.

On that note, you are an idiot for thinking this person was asking a
question. Did your dyslexia randomly replace bitching and moaning with
question marks and pleasantry?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're so braindead, you have to reply to me twice for the same post
eh? You're a joke!

So you're going to hide from my words behind a very fractured sentence
and an insult. I replied to you twice for the same post? No, I replied
to you twice for two very different posts, one directed at you, one
directed at the OP. The reason I directed one at the OP was because
you made it seem like he was being intelligent and asking questions.
When I saw that this was not the case and the rest of the post was
filled with idiocy, I was driven to respond.

Once again, where did he ask a question?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not hiding from anything and you didn't reply from two different post,
and I'll make you look like the idiot you are right now by copying and
pasting how you replied to the same post twice, as if you needed to
keep going on about something, here goes (right in line where everyone
can read it, with the actual links too);

Once again, your dyslexia prevents you from having an actual argument.
I understand I replied to a post twice, your exact wording is 'You're
so braindead, you have to reply to me twice for the same post eh?
You're a joke!' I did NOT reply twice FOR the SAME post. I replied
twice for two completely different posts. I am now pretty sure you
meant to say FROM the same post, but even that doesn't make a lot of
sense. You even admit I reply with a completely different response,
thus I obviously did not reply FOR the same post.

Since you seem to want to ignore it, I'll ask you again; When did the
OP ask a question?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember ***, these are your words, "I replied
twice for two completely different posts"

Show me the two completely different posts, I know you can't because I
already showed you the text to which you replied the first two times
to me. I just showed you that you replied to the same post I initially
made, which was the very first one, and you did each with a different
response as if you didn't finish moaning the first time, but felt you
needed to piss a little more. You can see the words that I typed the
first time in this thread, are in your *first two* replies to me. Now
you do deny this (while trying poorly at semantics) and look more
idiotic in front of everyone here who reads these threads..

I also won't answer your question, because my second post (don't get
confused with my first one, OK!) was in regard to the OP not asking a
question, and I alluded to that by saying right off in my SECOND post
"So fricking what!". You not only have reading comprehension skills,
but you also exhibit terrible lack of depth in understanding.

This is a perfect time to give you an example of what I did before.
Here I am replying to a post I just replied to, but I am not replying
to you twice for the same post. (Which isn't even a correct sentence
anyways).

You said 'so fricking what!' in your THIRD post, and how I am supposed
to know that this is acknowledging that he didn't ask a question?
There were two points in the paragraph you said that to and it could
have easily been referring to him not playing as a spy.

.