Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- From: Rich Billionaire <fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:56:44 -0700
There's really no good reason to create games for the PS3. It has no
significant advantage over the xbox 360, and it's a new machine, and
it's much harder to program than the 360. If I were running a game
company, I'd just forget about the PS3. So for those reasons, I think
there will continue to be a lack of great games. The PS3 is not needed
in the marketplace.
Sony should have made the PS3 much better than the xbox 360 and then
released it before microsoft comes out with the next generation.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- From: The alMIGHTY N
- Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- References:
- "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- From: Jordan
- Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- From: mark johnson
- Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- From: RMZ
- Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- From: CellFish
- Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- From: Doug Jacobs
- "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- Prev by Date: Re: HUGE NEWS ABOUT HALO
- Next by Date: Maxell backs Blu-ray for camcorder market
- Previous by thread: Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- Next by thread: Re: "Why Did the PS3 Fail?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|