Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- From: "Tom" <noway@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:09:00 -0400
"Nick Soapdish, Jr." <JGordon452@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1188951182.509387.157170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 4, 5:54 pm, "CellFish" <nomores...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:<alvinstraigh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1188937894.210198.204330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> With that logic, Xbox 1 was dumped because of a small install base.
>>From what I call, Microsoft dumped the console in its prime. Why?
> Simply to make more $$$. Microsoft doesn't care about giving gamers a
> great experience. They want your money, plain and simple. Why put
> your trust in a company that has a history of creating monopolies and
> charging outrageous prices for their software?
The Xbox 1 was dumped because nVidia was no longer producing the GPU needed
for the Xbox to even exist. It was nVidia's decision, not Microsoft's. Also,
the Xbox had a better install base than the Gamecube and it had no effect on
the system being 'dumped.' Buried as inaccurate.
> It's called a proven track record. Just like I know that a new
> Blizzard game is going to be good. The odds that Ps3 will simply die
> off are slim to none. The odds are better that Sony will be
> supporting the PS3 for many years to come.
Remember Minidisc and Betamax? Buried as false propaganda.
> If you want to talk history, Xbox 360 had a horrible launch with games
> like Kameo and Perfect Dark totally tanking. This time last year,
> there was only like 2 good games for Xbox. Face it, the console has
> produced only two system sellers, Gears of Wars. I will be able to
> play Gears of War on my PC with extra content, and Halo 3 will
> eventually find its way to PC. There is no reason to own a Xbox for
> exclusives.
Gears of War is not TWO system sellers, it is only one. Microsoft has Halo
3, Gears of War, Bioshock, Crackdown (and people really love this game),
Lost Planet, Dead Rising, Project Gotham Racing, Forza Motorsport 2 and
Saint's Row as system-selling exclusives that are already available (with
the exception of Halo 3 coming in a matter of weeks). It has Mass Effect,
Lost Odyssey, Splinter Cell Conviction, Fable 2 coming as more
system-selling exclusives. On XBLA, it has Bomberman Live (as pathetic as it
seems) as the greatest multiplayer game exclusive to the 360. So far, the
system sellers the Sony fanbase was expecting out of Warhawk, Lair and
Heavenly Sword are anything but that. Buried as ill-informed propaganda.
> = weeks of not having a console. That would suck around holidays.
> Regardless of their
> Warranty, it is still a major pain to have to package and mail your
> console to them.
It's a major pain to put a console in a ready-made box and bringing it to
the post office? You must have been one hell of an idiot student. Buried as
pure stupidity.
> That's lame. Yes, I have the option to NOT use these features if I
> don't want to.
> The inferior ports have only been the result of lazy developers, not
> Sony's fault. Oblivion proved to be quite SUPERIOR on PS3, and Ninja
> Gaiden Sigma blew Xbox's version out of the water.
Oblivion is worse on the PS3 and every reviewer thinks so.. your opinion as
a twat means nothing in comparison to dozens of experienced >reviewers.
What? Unless you're referring to the lack of DLC for Oblivion on the
PS3, the professional reviews pretty much all say that the PS3 version
is _slightly_ better looking and better running than the Xbox 360
version. Please show proof that "every reviewer thinks" that
Oblivion's base game is worse on the PS3, in terms of comments (the
scores will be lower, of course, because of the lack of DLC for the
PS3).
While the DLC does come into play, the BR allows for all of that content. But as for smoother running, yes because of data duplication to make load times faster. It didn't add to the quality of the graphics though. I couldn't imagine a game (as an example) on the PS3 that would be 20gig in size and scope of something like Oblivion. The load times would make it seem like years compared what a 12x DVD drive (or even the 16x + drives) can do. If the PS3 didn't duplicate the data, the load times would have been horrendously slow, since it can only read @ 2X.
.
- References:
- 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- From: alvinstraight38@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- From: The alMIGHTY N
- Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- From: alvinstraight38@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- From: CellFish
- Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- From: Nick Soapdish, Jr.
- 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- Prev by Date: Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- Next by Date: CM: Dirt is a pile of ***
- Previous by thread: Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- Next by thread: Re: 10 Reasons why PS3 is Superior to Xbox
- Index(es):
Loading