Re: Is there any real advantage to having an HDMI port?
- From: Doug Jacobs <djacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:57:48 -0000
Private Private <KSDJ1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And at the end of the day 1080 is still 1080 ...whether its interlaced
or progressive.
So..you're saying they're equivelent, because they're not.
1080i only does 540 lines a second, compared to 720 lines a second for
720p or 1080 for 1080p.
The difference between 720p and 1080i isn't going to be that noticable on
smaller screens. Larger screens, however, will show a difference as
Jordan illustrated.
This is assuming your source material is actually 1080p - and outside of
HD-DVD or Blu-Ray, there's not much that's native 1080p.
--
It's not broken. It's...advanced.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Is there any real advantage to having an HDMI port?
- From: Troy Telford
- Re: Is there any real advantage to having an HDMI port?
- From: Private Private
- Re: Is there any real advantage to having an HDMI port?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there any real advantage to having an HDMI port?
- Next by Date: Re: What would Jesus do?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there any real advantage to having an HDMI port?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there any real advantage to having an HDMI port?
- Index(es):