Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- From: archang@xxxxxx (Andrew Ryan Chang)
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 02:29:11 +0000 (UTC)
Imperium <frankmelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 13 May 2006 14:29:11 -0700, richardhutnik@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Why are companies predicting that the Wii is going to be the thirdThe same argument could have been made last generation with the xbox,
selling game system? It is cheaper than all of the above, and is a
console people would have little problem adding as a second one,
particularly if it ends up $250 or lower. The Wii could end up having
the largest installed based after it is all said and done.
ps2 and game cube. Technically Nintendo will probably finish 2nd to
Sony in terms of consoles sold but you would be hard pressed to find
anyone who thinks Nintendo had a strong showing overall.
Exactly. In fact, the GC debuted at $199 if memory serves. On
the other hand, that was a $100 difference or so from the other consoles
at the time; a Wii at $250 would be $250 to $350 less than a PS3.
--
"'We were all wrong," says weapons inspector David Kay. Actually, no. There was
one group whose prewar estimates of Iraqi nuclear, chemical and biological
capabilities have turned out to be devastatingly close to reality -- the U.N.
inspectors." -- Fareed Zakaria, Feb 9 2004.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- From: Freud
- Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- References:
- Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- From: Dan Sgambelluri
- Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- From: richardhutnik
- Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- From: Imperium
- Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- Prev by Date: Re: Swap with new drive
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- Next by thread: Re: Microsoft racing ahead in consoles war
- Index(es):