Who owns MAME?
- From: abaraba <zelkoaks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:21:06 -0800 (PST)
There are many changes to MAME code which instead of to improve MAME
and fix old bugs they introduce new bugs, bloat and unnecessary hacks.
However, we are not allowed to talk about on MAME World, BYOAC or KLOV
forum, they expect you will pretend those bugs and bloat do not exist.
Perhaps Aaron is being paid by Microsoft to introduce bloat and
slowdowns in MAME, for whatever reason Microsoft is doing the same
with their own software. And as funny as that sounds, or not, the
CONTROL of where the project is going, or what submission are
accepted, is not openly discussed, it is not subject to public
scrutiny nor there is any voting and majority consideration when those
decisions are made.
Now, everyone knows about David R. Foley affair and supposedly stolen
MAME trademark, which lifted up quite some dust and made a lot of
people and general public angry. However, in the same time the
ownership of far more important MAME assets are not even mentioned or
discussed anywhere. -- How did MAME get from Italy to Canada and
England? How did control over MAME get from Nicola to some Mr Mark
Colgan and proxy firm called 'contactprivacy' How is MAME a "public
project" if all the decisions are made behind closed doors and
everything is controlled by unknown selected individuals?
Who owns MAME?
- Prev by Date: Re: Attn: abaraba
- Next by Date: Who owns MAME?
- Previous by thread: Re: MAME: The Emperor's New Clothes
- Next by thread: Who owns MAME?