Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:37:13 +0800
It's a closed source which breaks part of the mame licence.
If you go to http://www.kaillera.com, there is a link
for you to download the source codes.
Mind to explain your complain further?
--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) Linux 2.6.24.2
^ ^ 12:35:01 up 12 days 2:35 0 users load average: 0.01 0.02 0.00
? ? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- From: Brennyn
- Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- References:
- Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- From: Amigoid
- Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie
- Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- From: Roman Scherzer
- Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie
- Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- From: Darren Wilkinson
- Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- Prev by Date: Crashtest mng files?
- Next by Date: Re: MAME: quick question. Simple mistake, big problem with options
- Previous by thread: Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- Next by thread: Re: Mame32 versus MAMEUI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|