Re: Slowing Games Down To 50 Hz ?
- From: "Incubus" <no@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 06:18:37 +1100
"Mark McDougall" <msmcdoug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
When I use mame, games are faster than the arcade machines.
Just trying to match them up.
I understand that, but you're completely on the wrong track and it's
going to help you get a solution.accurately,
Actually, I'm not that sure myself that MAME (or perhaps more
Windows) is very accurate. I've never run it side-by-side with anarcade
game but I have run it side-by-side with a few FPGA implementations(which
should be pretty accurately clocked) and it does differ quite a bitmore
than I'd expect.it
So perhaps you're never going to get it quite right?!?
Anyone else done some more accurate comparisons?
| Mark McDougall | "Electrical Engineers do
| <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug> | with less resistance!"
That's why I brought up the fact that I use Retrocade.
It allows me to change the frequency either faster or slower, in 1 Hz
increments, which includes going way above 60 Hz and way below 50 Hz.
This allows me to get it extremely close, if not spot on. I just wish
that Mame had this same function.
Maybe in a future version.