Re: Interesting MAME article
- From: Wavey Dragon <Wavey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:20:45 GMT
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:32:09 -0400, Cordata
<cordata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:10:11 GMT, SINNER
><arcade.master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>* Bastie Wrote in alt.games.mame:
>>
>>> Nobody is forcing anybody to download the new updates. If you
>>> don't like it, don't do it
>>
>>This is really the bottom line. If you were doing anything else, like
>>updateing per release, you are involved in a development cycle and you
>>are a beta tester. This morons inability to understand this very basic
>>yet obvious point proves how clueless he really is about what he was
>>involved in.
>
>
>Apparently the person that wrote the article has never used a
>Microsoft product either. I can think of quite a few times over the
>years that an update to Windows has broken compatibility with another
>program, and in some cases Windows itself.
>
>If I remember correctly, in that particular case, Microsoft's own
>products even have problems with the update. Some of their own
>products that were broken by SP2 included Visual Studio and Office, in
>some fashion.
>
>Botom line is that when you upgrade something, you should always
>expect that you might have to also update some of the supporting
>files.
>
>Oh well... You can't please everyone.
>
>In the case of this author, I think he has an extra "GOTO 10" line
>stuck in his head someplace...
Stuart Campbell (for it is he) has always been an arrogant toss pot of
the highest order. I've sort of had dealings with him in the past
which resulted i na rewritten article after we applied some pressure.
I don't mind journalists having personality, in fact it's a bonus. But
autommically assuming what you say is god, without checking your facts
(or in the case of him, having a disclaimer - warning writer has his
head so far up his own arse he can't see daylight) is frankly
unforgivable.
Dazza.
Dragon whips it's tail.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting MAME article
- From: Rev. Stuart Campbell
- Re: Interesting MAME article
- References:
- Interesting MAME article
- From: Zedders
- Re: Interesting MAME article
- From: SINNER
- Re: Interesting MAME article
- From: Bastie
- Re: Interesting MAME article
- From: SINNER
- Interesting MAME article
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Technical Support
- Next by Date: Re: Anyone here do MAME compiles (not ROMs!) for others ($)
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting MAME article
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting MAME article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|