Re: Where did I go wrong? (Spare Ribs)

Dave Bugg wrote:

Bill Funk wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:52:08 -0700, "Dave Bugg" <davebugg2@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Bill Funk wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:24:42 -0700, "Dave Bugg"
<davebugg2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...
Because it was you who brought up "20 minutes", not the OP.

ROTFLMAO!!!! Please, now... you're just embarrasing yourself. The
20 minute answer, as I've already explained a few times, was
directed at the OP and pertains to what the OP stated in his post.

So, you recognize that it was YOU who brought it up.
That's good.

Huh???? I never said I didn't provide the OP with my answer.

But, as I also said, in my original question to you in this thread:

"I hear this a lot, but I'm not quite convinced this is true."

So, as you will see (but maybe not, given your inability to read
well), I we not referring specifically to 20 minutes in your reply,
but to the many other times this same 20 minute figure has been
mentioned.

Yet you said it in the context of MY specific answer. MY answer was
directed at the specific OP and his question.

No, I never said that at all.
Go back and re-read my original post to you.

I have. You tagged on to an existing thread and based your question on my
reply to the OP. So, you need to re-read the thread and attempt to get the
context correct.


Is this all just a misunderstanding, based on your lack of reading
compehension? If it is, just say so.

If there is any misunderstanding it is from you. If you are
claiming, now, that you were not talking about MY specific reply to
the OP, just say so. Oh, you just did when you said this above: "I
we not referring specifically to 20 minutes in your reply, but to
the many other times this same 20 minute figure has been mentioned."

Yes, don't you understand that?
I' not referring to your 20 minute response to the OP in referrence to
*his* situation, but to the many times I've seen the truism that every
time yiou open the door, it adds 20 minutes to the cooking time.
I've been very clear about this, and you keep missing it.

I don't keep missing anything. I won't let you redirect the context.

If you didn't want to be misunderstood, a seperate thread would have
helped. A thread labeled: "How long is cooking time increased when
you open a pit?" or "Is 20 minutes a myth?" or "Why does it extend
cooking time 20 minutes when a pit is opened?"

It takes a seperate thread?

It does if you are attempting to redirect the intent of my reply into a
general discussion.

Ok, just pretend it was a seperate thread.
I didn't know you can't handle more thna one thought at a t ime.

It is *your* job to be specific about whatever context you wish to convey.
It is not my job to guess that you are barging into a conversation and
redirecting my reply into a whole different conversation.

This would be an excellent way to end ths all now.

I guess we'll see. Ta Ta For Now.

It's really up to you.

If you wish to stop, then you'll stop. If you wish to continue, you'll do
so. Whatever.

<Stretch> <Yawn>.
He made a fool of you Dave. You need a good stretch and sleep
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Where did I go wrong? (Spare Ribs)
    ... well), I we not referring specifically to 20 minutes in your reply, ... Yet you said it in the context of MY specific answer. ... it adds 20 minutes to the cooking time. ... I won't let you redirect the context. ...
    (alt.food.barbecue)
  • Re: Remote Printer Problem.
    ... |>You seem to be referring to some past postings, ... So again I apologize if expecting you ... expect anything special from me either, so if you post without context, ... I was just referring to the fact that these are ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: Dylan: a human jukebox?
    ... it sounds like he might be referring to a bit of stage fright. ... Without context you might be referring to an album by The Band. ... You're Jinx, though, ...
    (rec.music.dylan)
  • Re: Me too (was Re: On departing SCJM)
    ... the context of the post if not the similarity in the names used. ... At that point, it became a reasonable question to re-ask, since ... have the slightest idea of the person to whom he was referring. ... just who is that mysterious "Rambak" to whom I referred? ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: Mini-bar keys open Diebold voting machines
    ... Pelosi from an area that is filled with fags and queers to be majority ... I assume you are referring to THE FUCKING TERRORISTS ... I guess reading things in context is too ... My reading is fine, I was giving you an opportunity to fine tune your ...
    (alt.fan.howard-stern)
Loading