Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- From: "EMiriamD" <emiriamd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jun 2006 11:53:52 -0700
I'm still a big fan of CG's Trublend and don't plan on giving it up any
time soon. The difference, to my eye, is that the Trublend, being a
powder foundation, gives a finish that looks more matte (although not
nearly as dry and powdery as many others). The Bare Naturale, like all
mineral foundations, has some sheen to it, so the final look more on
the dewy side.
HTH!
sleepi8 wrote:
EMiriamD wrote:
Hits:
*L'Oreal's mineral foundation, Bare Naturale. Terrific! Better than
Bare Escentuals because it applies more evenly and with practically
none of that odd mineral foundation sheen. Even the teeny little
kabuki brush that's attached to the sifter top works well. Also, the
L'Oreal has SPF 19, a bit more than Bare Escentual's 15. For the
record, I'm 1.2 (Fairly Light) in Bare Escentuals and Light Ivory in
the L'Oreal.
How does this compare to the Covergirl Trublend powder foundation?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- From: figfunston
- Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- From: sleepi8
- Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- References:
- May/June Hits and Misses
- From: Vicki in DC
- Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- From: ahmward
- Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- From: Vicki in DC
- Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- From: EMiriamD
- Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- From: sleepi8
- May/June Hits and Misses
- Prev by Date: Re: What I Bought Today
- Next by Date: Re: Pic of Nicole K. and Keith wedding
- Previous by thread: Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- Next by thread: Re: May/June Hits and Misses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|