Re: Does the Force actually exists...?

Vincent wrote:
i disagree. i think it can constitute as a powerful response.

No, it really can't.

guess we interpret it differently then

It's only used by someone without a very good rebuttal yet they still have a desire to give the last word.

the way i always interpret 'whatever' if as follows: 'you're not
listening to me, you only want me to see things your way, i quit'

interesting to know this, isn't it

Interesting to see the ease in which you shy away from others' POV. You assume I didn't "know" what you have stated, which is inaccurate I assure you. I was only annoyed you likely championed this particular interpretation of the word whatever's all too common usage.

in my mind you are mathematically limited, more than you need to be
"mathematically limited"? I guess I'm just too slow,

in my mind not too slow, but not 'experienced' enough

i mean you 'obey' patterns. i 'sense' a limited amount of freedom in
your world. in my mind you too often are forced into making decisions.


In reading your posts, which is the only way by which I could possibly judge you, I sincerely doubt your "experience" is so much greater than mine. I think your reasoning is flawed and I wanted you to be clear in your intent before I refuted your strange claim.

Your "sense" is ridiculous and there is no legitimate way in which you could have come to this conclusion since you clearly have not read anything else I have posted outside of this thread. Through what supposition have you determined I am often forced into making decisions? When I read your "mathematically limited" inference, I assumed you where talking about the way I wrote, not this absurd, the way you think idiocy.

I write for a living; there is hardly a profession in which a person is less likely to be caged by patterns or less likely to be forced into making a decision. You, of course, didn't know this, but instead decided to take it upon yourself to rail against a person who can present themselves more clearly and more eloquently than yourself. The fact your original post in this thread was barely coherent was the only reason I responded the way I did.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Developing a focused set of questions for IDists - Comments encouraged
    ... By that reasoning, the study of patterns in chicken entrails is just an ... I think it is more likely that something like Soviet DNA tampering ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: New A C Grayling book
    ... We have some reasoning ability because it's useful. ... So do lots of other animals. ... We differ from them in ... As I write that I am reminded that one of the great messages of the Bible is the concept of 'Types', that we see patterns of behaviour / roles that recur throughout the Scriptures, and which are to believers a sign of the hand of God at work. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: Which Singularity Dont You Want?
    ... the problem lies with the ability of human beings to see patterns in ... > won't let go of any cookies, even though he can't get his hand out of ... evolution must have provided excellent reasoning tools. ... The monkey doesn't have faulty reasoning - he just doesn't have ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Looking for a book that focuses on design process for Java
    ... From memory Eckel's book* got close... ... I missed the original post, but I'll definitely recommend Thinking in ... Patterns, Thinking in Java and Thinking in C++ by Bruce Eckel. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Formatting Postcodes in VBA (Bob Philips, Myrna Larson + Jamie Collins?)
    ... I don't think Regular Expressions save you much. ... If the code is correct input, there are only 2 patterns to match in the ... "Bob Phillips" wrote in message ... >>> from my original post was intended for use in a SQL Server/Jet CHECK ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.programming)