Re: ROTS
- From: Anybody <anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:21:10 +1300
In article <mjPgf.809$fO5.633@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Guest"
<n0gar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Anybody" <anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:221120050903592100%anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In article <Xilgf.1020$Ba6.650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Guest"
> > <n0gar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> "Anybody" <anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:211120051611474889%anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >
> >> > As I just said, he LOOKED older then he really was because of the
> >> > injuries, but he wasn't the same as as Ben at all.
> >>
> >> I guess that is your 'fanboy' excuse? He LOOKED about the same age as
> >> Kenobi with the mask off(regardless of injuries as we can tell an injury
> >> from old age!) AND after he had come back to being good at the end of the
> >> original ROTJ. Either you are too young to have seen the original or you
> >> forgot?
> >
> > It's not a "fanyboy excuse" - it's the proper answer.
> >
> > As someone else has given a quote for, we already knew Anakin was
> > younger than Ben.
> >
> > As usual it's the fools who sit in front of the cinema / TV screen with
> > their brains truned off that complain about so-called "problems" that
> > don't even exist. :-\
>
> No - it's the 'think we know it all' nerds who make excuses for things that
> just do not exist.
As usual, if you're not going to believe the answers, then don't bother
wasting our time asking the questions. :-\
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: ROTS
- Next by Date: Re: Obi ROTS question
- Previous by thread: Re: ROTS
- Next by thread: Re: ROTS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
