Re: ROTS
- From: Anybody <anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:03:59 +1300
In article <Xilgf.1020$Ba6.650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Guest"
<n0gar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Anybody" <anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:211120051611474889%anybody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > As I just said, he LOOKED older then he really was because of the
> > injuries, but he wasn't the same as as Ben at all.
>
> I guess that is your 'fanboy' excuse? He LOOKED about the same age as
> Kenobi with the mask off(regardless of injuries as we can tell an injury
> from old age!) AND after he had come back to being good at the end of the
> original ROTJ. Either you are too young to have seen the original or you
> forgot?
It's not a "fanyboy excuse" - it's the proper answer.
As someone else has given a quote for, we already knew Anakin was
younger than Ben.
As usual it's the fools who sit in front of the cinema / TV screen with
their brains truned off that complain about so-called "problems" that
don't even exist. :-\
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: After watching Eps. III & IV
- Next by Date: Re: Why would officer challenge Vader?
- Previous by thread: Re: ROTS
- Next by thread: Re: ROTS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
