Re: CNN.com Dave 'Sextortion' Article : Some Interesting Analysis/Quotes
- From: Terry <terrym1011@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 26, 2:53 am, garyd <applekra...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 25, 12:11 pm, Jess Band-ee-Coot <LateShoBandic...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
'Sextortion' is latest issue pushing Letterman into spotlight
By Lisa Respers France
A representative for Letterman's company, Worldwide Pants, said, "All
the relationships David Letterman was referencing when discussing the
matter on the 'Late Show' predated his marriage to Regina" in March.
...they were *begun* prior to the marriage but Dave hasn't come clean on
whether or not they ceased *after* the marriage?
"The good thing about a bee (I'm not talking about a Bumble Bee)
is that it stings once and then it dies.
I wish I could say the same for Steve Curtis.”
I don't think Letterman has to "come clean" about anything. It's
really none of our business. Letterman is not an elected official. His
paycheck is not paid by tax payer's money. If you are upset by what he
did, don't watch him. There's 500 other channels to watch at 11:35 pm
or you can just turn off the TV and go to bed.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
That's brilliant, man. Were you in the Bush cabinet? I haven't seen
that level of thinking since GWB left Washington.
Write it down, people: "If you don't like it, change the channel."
Words to live by. Thanks, Einstein.
- Prev by Date: Re: Paul's book
- Next by Date: Re: Paul's book
- Previous by thread: Re: CNN.com Dave 'Sextortion' Article : Some Interesting Analysis/Quotes
- Next by thread: Re: CNN.com Dave 'Sextortion' Article : Some Interesting Analysis/Quotes