Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Kath <creelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 26, 4:17 pm, "Alan Page" <alp...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Kath" wrote...
Nope they didn't stop and stalk me here either, they ditched me!
Sharon did take a picture of a family together from Lisbon, Australia.
They had been traveling around and never had their picture taken of all
of them.
2 grandparents, a daughter with her two children and a man they
described as the "son-in-law" who apparently they don't consider a part of
their family.
Is that common down-under there?
(a dumb guy) Huh?
Umm not knowing the situation I can't say, because most people here
consider defacto partners as part of the family.
Sounds like something got lost in the translation!
Kath
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Alan Page
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- References:
- LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Alan Page
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Brady
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Alan Page
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Brady
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Alan Page
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Greg Evans
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Alan Page
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Greg Evans
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Kath
- Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- From: Alan Page
- LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- Prev by Date: Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- Next by Date: Re: Traci's use of the word "cunt"
- Previous by thread: Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- Next by thread: Re: LSQG - Wednesday, 9/24/MMVIII #2987
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|