Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- From: "Marilyn" <marilynsgt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:46:08 -0400
Tom Cronin wrote:
Hi Kids---
A current, ongoing thread which I will not reference (although right
now, I think the argument is focused on verb tenses and spelling) has
caused me to become a bit wistful... thinking back to all those threads
in my seven years of following the AFL (but only posting for 6 1/2----
like a smart newsgroup contributor, I lurked for quite some time before
tentatively hitting the 'send' button) that identified the posters who
really drove us to the point of insanity: their posts were inane,
clueless, poorly written, and completely off-topic, but they were
compelling nonetheless.
I just lost it and posted my thoughts in that thread before I read this one.
Oh well.
They wouldn't be eligible anyway because they are not even close to
compelling.
Our friend Coggy's Great Adventures a year ago wouldn't be eligible because
while compelling, it just wasn't poorly written.
And our Gentonist friend, Torkington Z. Bort, is not clueless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- From: Tom Wolper
- Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- From: bostonbill41
- Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- References:
- Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- From: Tom Cronin
- Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- Prev by Date: Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- Next by Date: Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- Previous by thread: Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- Next by thread: Re: Dark Week Fun! AFL Knucklehead Hall Of Fame
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|