Re: OT: Living Up to the Late-Night Legacy
- From: iamh2oman@xxxxxxxxx (Steve Curtis)
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:55:15 -0800
Brady wrote:
>DTSmith wrote:
>>Steve Curtis wrote:
>>>Paul's laughing during the monologue
>>>and throughout the show is all part of
>>>the "schtick" and is probably
>>>encouraged.
>>I think it would be a much better show
>>without the "schtick." In fact, I know a
>>couple of people who won't watch the
>>show simply because of Paul. [...]
>That's just wrong.
>(That's my new 'thing' -- saying "that's
>just wrong." I'm pretty sure it won't get
>annoying.)
I tend to agree. IMO, Paul's laughing enhances the humorous "ambience"
as part of the reaction to Dave, the jokes, the bits, etc. The fact that
Paul's laughs may be infectious to some and annoying to others, adds
another humorous element to the moment.
.
- References:
- Re: OT: Living Up to the Late-Night Legacy
- From: Brady
- Re: OT: Living Up to the Late-Night Legacy
- Prev by Date: Re: Latest Letterman sked: New Monday/Friday schedule
- Next by Date: Favorite opening theme?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Living Up to the Late-Night Legacy
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Living Up to the Late-Night Legacy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
