Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: KK <_KK_@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:09:00 GMT
On Wed, 21 May 2008 07:54:07 -0400, tar~bal wrote:
"KK" <_KK_@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.05.20.19.23.35.915509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:20:32 -0400, tar~bal wrote:
I mean, on what grounds?
I don't know, she could accuse him of tarnishing her reputation by
manipulating her quotes? I've never heard the bit so I'm not prepared to
step up as council, but I still hope she sues his ass off...
She could accuse him of anything she wants, but there's no grounds for a
lawsuit. Even if Stern's a douche and you like her jugs.
Just because a suit has no grounds doesn't mean that they aren't filed every
day.
So? I didn't say that a suit couldn't be filed if it were baseless.
.
- References:
- NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: Sue M .
- Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: tar~bal
- Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: KK
- Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: tar~bal
- Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: KK
- Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: tar~bal
- Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: KK
- Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- From: tar~bal
- NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- Prev by Date: Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- Next by Date: A reminder of why Stern is a douchebag.
- Previous by thread: Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- Next by thread: Re: NY Post Page Six column: Lighten up, Dolly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|