Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: Drumrboy <Drumrboy@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:10:16 -0400
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:58:36 -0400, Locutus wrote
(in article <13ijqct2rjgmkf1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
"Drumrboy" <Drumrboy@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C34F5E240086AD2DB01AD9AF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:36:19 -0400, Locutus wrote
(in article <13ijp34ahcmio66@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
"Drumrboy" <Drumrboy@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C34F5AD80085E75BB01AD9AF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:21:40 -0400, Locutus wrote
(in article <13ijo7ln4jasr8c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
"Drumrboy" <drumrboy@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1193883051.717402.75630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 31, 5:06 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:06:46 -0700, Drumrboy <drumr...@xxxxxxx>
puked:
On Oct 31, 4:03 pm, Paulie Walnuts <g...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/9707/sterns2bitchesbe7.jpg
Is this what they mean by a "dog and pony show"?
Now that's a certified groaner. LOL
Hey man, It can't all be *A* material. :)
How about just some of it? That would be a start.
That's not even *C* material. That's Howard Stern funny right there.
Jeremy>
It is not material at all, it is simply an observation.
Like Sienfeld observations that aren't funny either?
Jeremy>
You don't think Sienfelds observations are funny?
Most of the time, no, I don't find them funny.
Jeremy>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: lab~rat >:-)
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- References:
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: Drumrboy
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: Locutus
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: Drumrboy
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: Locutus
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: Drumrboy
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- From: Locutus
- Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- Prev by Date: Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Just checked my email
- Previous by thread: Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- Next by thread: Re: Howie's 2 Bitches
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|