Re: Why did Howard interview this Battlestar Galactica broad?


"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bihcr251gn7e5l9d03frbapv31ehnkp54g@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:15:57 -0500, "Locutus"
<locutus_atai@xxxxxxxxxxx> puked:


"KK" <_KK_@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.01.22.21.19.20.751313@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:12:15 -0500, JMiller wrote:

It does,
however, mean that you're a fan of the show if you're here.

Defined by who - you?

I listened to (and enjoyed) Stern far longer than you have, and I first
posted here probably a decade before you. Even if you weren't a
caricature-like idiot, you'd be in no place to tell me what belongs
here.

Discussion about where the show has gone - whether positive or
negative -
is appropriate here. To suggest that it's not is to try to apply
the Stern-board-like idiocy of only wanting to hear those opinions you
already believe, and it's a sign of intellectual weakness and
underdevelopment.


Do see the word FAN between alt and howard-stern?

That means this NG is for Howard Stern fans.


Well that's what I considered myself for years. Are you telling me to
leave just because Howard got bad?

And BTW, welcome to usenet. Glad that you finally found us here.
While you're getting acquainted to the way things work, may I suggest
not posting things that make you look like an obvious newbie.


An obvious newbie? LOL... I've been posting to usenet since about 94.


.