Re: Stern's leap to satellite the year's biggest flop

On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:52:30 -0500, Rocinante wrote:

Like the bleat of a sheep, they repeat this over and over again, though XM
added about as many subs (more if you ignore churn) in the same period of
time without Stern.

There's no way around that fact.

No, the point is that XM was the household name before Howard's
announcement. There was no reason to choose Sirius over XM before the
announcement, and the numbers showed that back in 2004.

So? Nobody's claiming Stern didn't bring attention to Sirius. That's a
far cry from showing how he's responsible for all their subscriptions.