Re: YOU ARE UNDER THE GOBLIN'S SPELL!!!

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:10:23 -0400, "Roger McDoogal"
<mcdoogal@xxxxxxxx> puked:

>
>"Diane aka Whatever" <whoever@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:V_OdnVIRp5PhEWbfRVn-qA@xxxxxxxxxx
>> If you don't know, I won't waste my time telling you. You must read this
>> newsgroup with your eyes closed.
>> I am going to look into my crystal ball because I don't want to take the
>> blame if I am wrong ..
>>
>> You are either:
>> 1] a new stern fan. [my best guess.] Under the age of 30.
>> 2] an intern ..
>> 3] or long time listener, sal the stockbroker wanna be.
>>
>> You don't like what is said about your hero .. and you stop there, never
>> seeing the talent in this group. Too bad for you .. Just one other thing
>> .. what is it that would keep people reading here daily for up to or more
>> than 10 years if it isn't for the genius in here. And don't say something
>> stupid about people not having a life .. This newsgroup is OVER FLOWING
>> with talented .. SUPER FUNNY .. Quick with a come back - better than that
>> MORON BENJI - jokewriters.
>> .
>
>I have been reading and participating in this newsgroup sporadically since
>1992, most likely longer than you. I constantly alter my name because
>sometimes I want to agree with an enemy, but not allow him to know about it.
>I have had serveral verbal battles with the regulars here (usually when they
>discredit me for liking something on the show), and have been unimpressed
>with their alleged 'wit', which seems to consist of retorts such as "you're
>retarded," "you're gay," "you're a douche bag," "you're a retarded gay
>douche bag," and similarly ingenious remarks. Nobody in here shows signs of
>being able to verbally spar above the level of a 6th grader, including
>yourself.
>
>For instance, you attempt to diffuse the primary negative assessment that
>can be made about you from what limited information we have: "don't say
>something stupid about [anti-hoo hoo obsessed] people not having a life."
>What makes this statement stupid exactly? Its accuracy? The fact that it is
>the one true thing that can be said about you without knowing any additional
>information? Announcing that this statement is stupid is your way of
>conceding that it is true, and that you do not want to be reminded of the
>truth yet again. The sheer frequency of your posts gives a hint that there
>is something missing in your life that compels you to post feverishly to
>newsgroups, defending strangers and the weird anti-stern ideology/fixation
>that none of you kooks has ever been able to fully explain; we get that you
>don't like him, so why waste all this time? Do you not have anything more
>productive to do? The fact that you tried to dismiss this insult before it
>is even uttered is pretty strong evidence that it hurts you to hear it. In
>an argument, one would never preemptively say, "Mentioning my fat ass is off
>limits" unless one had a fat ass and did not want to be reminded of it yet
>again.
>
>As to your accusation that I am an intern, etc.... It is no wonder why you
>think the people in this group are talented - you clearly have zero reading
>comprehension. I mentioned multiple times that I am a passive fan of the
>show, and have clearly stated that I am not interested in Howard enough to
>continue listening after his move to Sirius. And you dare assert to me that
>you won't waste your time telling me who these phantom talents are, when you
>won't even waste your time reading the original post? You are more defensive
>of your anti-Hoo Hoo position than you accuse the "interns" of being with
>regards to their "hero." Why else would you jump on a thread without even
>reading it (unless, as I suspect, you simply didn't understand it)? As
>mentioned in my original post, you cannot accept that somebody kinda likes
>the show, or finds parts funny. It is inconceivable, in your madness, to
>concede this as a possibility without the person being a full-blown "goblin
>ass licker" or whatever the current description you give to anyone who says,
>"I liked one of the bits today."
>
>I need not rehash the general insults that you've been subject to for so
>long. Having eviscerated you in this post, I don't expect a reply, except
>maybe from one of your demented counterparts wishing to be dashed
>themselves, in yet another display of that odd tendency for you disturbed
>individuals to defend each other. And whatever reply I receive, I'm sure,
>will be in one of the following forms:
>
>1) You're an intern.
>2) Thanks for posting Sal.
>3) You're a ***.
>4) You're a douche bag *** intern douche.
>
>Yet another scathing rebuke from the many talented writers here at
>alt.fan.howard-stern!
>

That's a lot of typing up there. If you are so unimpressed with the
Stern haters, why do you obsess so much that you have to write a
diatribe that rivals the length of the new Harry Potter book?

Sounds to me like you need to get a life.

Douche bag *** intern douche loser ***.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
.