Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- From: Louis Epstein <le@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:45:26 -0500
BubblyBabs <ng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: <SNIP>
:> :> And what of kings, always offering their daughters to the first hero
:> :> who saves them. Killing a dragon does not a great husband make.
:> : No, but it gets the daughter off his hands. Daughters in a patriarchal
:> : society are considered a liability, fit only for bargaining them off
:> : to someone for political advantage.
:> : Sorry about that, women's lib folks, but that is the way things WERE.
:>
:> More practically,these kings are usually shown as being without sons,
:> and a dragonslayer would presumably make a good successor.But legitimacy
:> as a successor requires marrying into the old dynasty.
:
: No sons probably due to inbreeding... Marrying the daughter off to a hero
: would probably guarantee he was not related and would introduce new genes
: into the pool...
: Babs
Does inbreeding reduce fertility?
Besides,mediaeval peasants were more likely to be inbred than royalty;
royals married distant cousins from distant cousins while serfs were
rarely allowed outside their own lords' lands.
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- From: BubblyBabs
- Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- From: Green-Eyed Chris
- Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- References:
- Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- From: Louis Epstein
- Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- From: BubblyBabs
- Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- Prev by Date: Re: The Diary - Which death?
- Next by Date: Re: That Awful Epilogue and Lord of the Rings
- Previous by thread: Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- Next by thread: Re: Cho Chang not Ginny
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|