Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: "DaveD" <davedn1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:11:08 +0100
"santosh" <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:g6cllh$kaa$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thom Madura wrote:
<snip>
However - I always thought that the final battle would have shown a
McGonagle that was a lot more powerful that we thought. Is it possible
that McGonagle is like Hermione - extremely well versed in magic - but
maybe not quite as powerful at it as some?
This is what I feel too.
I get the impression that powerful magic in the Potterverse is a combination of 3 things: research- knowledge-study; innate ability, a sort of natural inborn power; and practice. You can compensate for weakness in one area by working hard at the others, but that weakness still results in a plateau or barrier beyond which you can't progress.
It's a bit like many sports - you can work out in the gym, study strategy and have a good coach to improve your technique, but not having the right build or balance of stamina-v-explosive power for that particular sport or event will still limit your success. Conversely, someone may have the right build, but if their technique is poor and they don't practise, they generally don't do very well.
Hermione is obviously the first - knowledge - with a lot of the third - practice - but it seems she's not all that innately powerful, and McGonagall seems fairly similar: at the Battle of Hogwarts her approach seems to be more canny, using clever tactics rather than raw power. Transfiguration, which seems to be her speciality, appears to be more about focus and dexterity than power.
Harry appears to be fairly average in those two areas in that he doesn't study or (usually) practice anything like Hermione does, but he does have a fair bit of innate ability with some things, especially Defence against the Dark Arts skills, eg his Patronus, and resisting the Imperius curse.
On the hand Voldy, Dd, and probably Grindelnwald too, seem to be good in all three areas which is presumably why they became the outstanding wizards of their age - they studied a lot, they seem to be naturally powerful, and also practised.
DaveD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: Toon
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: Thom Madura
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- References:
- Slytherin Public Relations: Deathly Hallows Spoilers
- From: Tim Bruening
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations: Deathly Hallows Spoilers
- From: Yellow
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: Chip Stobb
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: Toon
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: DaveD
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: Thom Madura
- Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- From: santosh
- Slytherin Public Relations: Deathly Hallows Spoilers
- Prev by Date: Molly Weasley
- Next by Date: Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- Next by thread: Re: Slytherin Public Relations & More Questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|