Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- From: Yellow <yell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:31:56 +0100
Deevo [mckenzie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] said:
"Toon" <toon@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4r59041kon2bl5fh9dqru62p7f2mfhaoce@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.rr.com/flash/index.cfm?news=ENTERTAINMENT|4824652
I'm not signing up just to read a news story thanks.
Here is a short clip of an interview that might be of interest to some:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7348238.stm
And this is a slightly less tabloid account of the day in court:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/
article3746505.ece
or shorter because it wrapped:
http://tinyurl.com/5o3ru7
All I can say is don't be such a drama mama. There's no reason not to
publish the official version, nor to stop writing all together.
Till I've seen the article in question or t least a quote from it I'll be
keeping an open mind.
Indeed, as I'm sure we do not know the half of it.
Is this a re hash of the Lexicon case then?
Yep.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- From: Deevo
- Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- From: Steve Morrison
- Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- References:
- Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- From: Toon
- Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- From: Deevo
- Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- Prev by Date: Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- Next by Date: Another method of destroying horcruxes?
- Previous by thread: Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- Next by thread: Re: Rowling: Potter Reference Book Is Theft
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|