Re: What transfer of ownership?
- From: dicconf@xxxxxxxxx (Richard Eney)
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:34:11 -0000
In article <479e5c02$0$6354$607ed4bc@xxxxxx>,
Thom Madura <Tommadura@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard Eney wrote:<snip>
Thom Madura <Tommadura@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
santosh wrote
What changed? The conditions were the same both in the Forest, whenThe snake wasn't dead yet - Voldemort couldn't die.
Harry went to die willingly and in the Great Hall. In both cases Harry
was the Master of the EW and V the possessor. So why the dramatic
difference?
But he had a bunch of horcruxes back in PS/SS and he still died for real.
I think the house collapse was what killed his body.
=Tamar
Voldemort didn't die in PS/SS. I think that was a major point of the
whole series of books. His Horcruxes kept his soul bound to the earth.
Had he truly died - the story was over - as JKR has repeatedly said -
death is final - you cannot return.
Okay, better phrasing: back in PS/SS Voldemort's body died, possibly
as a result of being crushed when the house collapsed. Otherwise
his soul might not have been torn from his body to become VapourMort
while still living in a magical way because it was bound to the
earth by horcruxes (and not a ghost).
=Tamar
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What transfer of ownership?
- From: Drusilla
- Re: What transfer of ownership?
- References:
- What transfer of ownership?
- From: santosh
- Re: What transfer of ownership?
- From: Thom Madura
- Re: What transfer of ownership?
- From: Richard Eney
- Re: What transfer of ownership?
- From: Thom Madura
- What transfer of ownership?
- Prev by Date: Re: What transfer of ownership?
- Next by Date: Re: What transfer of ownership?
- Previous by thread: Re: What transfer of ownership?
- Next by thread: Re: What transfer of ownership?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
