Re: This would have been interesting
- From: santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:21:33 +0530
Toon wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:28:03 +0530, santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
BTW, Voldemort is described by Dumbledore at several points in the
story as being one of the most magically gifted and talented wizard
ever. I wonder why he could not recreate the Philosopher's Stone to
achieve immortality? Seems safer and less "destructive" than ripping
your soul into Horcruxes.
Far easier to destroy the Stone than a Horcrux. The Stone would need
to be hidden but easily accessed for continued use. A Horcrux can be
left alone for decades.
Yes good point. Also the point Rubeus makes.
.
- References:
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: Louis Epstein
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: santosh
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: Toon
- Re: This would have been interesting
- Prev by Date: Re: Things I would like to ak JKR
- Next by Date: Re: OOTP
- Previous by thread: Re: This would have been interesting
- Next by thread: Re: This would have been interesting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|